DONMARKET · RATES AS OF 4 SEPTEMBER 2026

Work with DON

You claim a result and nobody believes you. I verify claims on chain and publish what I find — whatever it says. That last part is the whole product: a number nobody can accuse you of writing yourself.

largest audit$22.1 M verified

Reconciled to 0.1% against money that actually left the account, on chain.

wallets checked7/7

Every wallet I could read end to end matched its advertised PnL.

measured daily293 books

Verdicts archived every day since 26 August — an archive nobody starting today can rebuild.

custom work$50 /hour

Five hours minimum, scoped in writing before anything starts.

If any of this is you

You sell a bot, a signal service, or a copy-trading feed, and every second comment is "screenshots prove nothing". You are raising money, or looking for people to follow your positions, and your only evidence is a dashboard you control. You are buying someone else's tool and you would like their numbers checked before you pay. Or you are a vendor making a specific, testable claim about your own product — which you cannot credibly test yourself.

In every one of those cases the missing piece is the same: someone who is not you, publishing the result before knowing whether it flatters you.

What that actually means

I measure prediction markets and I say what I cannot measure. The audit tool refuses to state a total while positions are open, or while there are events it cannot account for, and it names them. That restraint is the product. A number you can defend is worth more than a number that looks good — and a verification that could only ever come out positive would be worth nothing to the person you are trying to convince.

What one looks like

Published 3 September 2026, on a wallet a stranger handed me in public after I wrote “give me the address and I publish what comes out”. Delivered the same day.

The claim. A $5,200 deposit turned into roughly $492,000 of profit in three months. 10,000% return. Posted on Reddit with a screenshot, as they always are.

What the chain says. 32,346 acts read end to end, 19 June to 2 September, no truncation.

MeasuredValue
Deposits
The denominator nobody cites. The claim said $5,200.
$39,662,496
Withdrawals
$1.12M below deposits. Not a loss — capital is in open positions — but nothing has come out net.
$38,538,281
Settled positions
275 closed, +$16,772,616 realised. A 71.6% win rate that is an upper bound, not a result.
71.6%
upper bound
Still open
169 positions, $18,448,947 committed. Unsettled money is not profit.
$18.4M
Guaranteed floor
The worst case that survives every open position going to zero.
−4.2%
of deposits
Total PnL
Refused. 169 open positions plus 148 events the reader cannot account for — maker and taker rebates, referral rewards, yield. Each one named in the report.
not stated

The finding is not that the trader lied. The money is real and it moved. The finding is that a $5,200 denominator and a $39.7M denominator produce two different truths from the same wallet, and only one of them was posted. That is what you are buying: the denominator, and a refusal to state the number that cannot be stated.

The same run, on a first pass, hit an internal record cap and printed a “guaranteed floor” that was wrong by a factor of four. The tool now refuses the word guaranteed whenever any truncation occurred, and says so. That fix is public, dated and in the commit history — which is the only reason you should believe the numbers above.

Fixed prices

A fixed price means you can decide in ten seconds instead of estimating my hours. Scope is agreed in writing first, either way.

EngagementPrice
Verified track record
You claim a result. I reconcile the wallet on chain end to end — deposits, withdrawals, settled versus open positions, a guaranteed floor, and an explicit list of what cannot be verified — and publish it as a dated page you can link to. Whatever it says.
$300
Order-book health report
A set of markets measured over several days: which books are tradable, which are dead, spread and tick, depth on both sides, and how long each verdict has held.
$300
Archive access
The daily verdict archive as JSON, updated every day. Nobody starting today can rebuild it — it only exists because it was measured day after day.
$50
per month

Anything that does not fit the boxes above: $50/hour, five hours minimum.

Why me

Two days ago I published that Polymarket track records were structurally unverifiable. I was wrong, someone corrected me, and I said so publicly on the page and on Reddit rather than quietly patching it. Then I rebuilt the reader and the answer came out stronger. That sequence is the reference. You are not hiring someone who is never wrong; you are hiring someone who finds out, tells you, and fixes it the same day.

Evidence, all live and all reproducible: wallet verification · daily order-book health (293 books measured in the latest run) · source.

How payment works

USDC on Polygon

Which is how this ecosystem already pays. Half up front on engagements of $300 or more, the rest on delivery. Bank transfer possible but slower. Invoices are issued under my legal name.

What I do not sell

No trading signals, no copy-trading, no returns of any kind, and no predictions about which way a market will go. I sell measurement and the tooling around it. If a number cannot be verified, the deliverable says so — that is the whole point.

Getting in touch

Email midas93230@gmail.com with what you want measured. A useful first message is one wallet address or one market slug, and the question you actually want answered.

Page generated 4 September 2026. The figures above are read from the latest measurement rather than typed in, so they cannot quietly go stale.